Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 22:09
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
We will not stay silent on vaccines, say leaders of five major U.S. medical associations - STAT
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Graphene Is Stretchable? Physicists Make “Miracle Material” Bend Like Never Before - SciTechDaily
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Google reportedly plans to cut ties with Scale AI - TechCrunch
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
New questions emerge from the new charges in Kilmar Abrego Garcia case - NBC News
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Stocks Stay Lukewarm After US, China Trade Talks: Markets Wrap - Bloomberg
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Thank you.